Framer, Webflow, or custom code: Which to use to build a web app in 2025

Framer, Webflow, or custom code: Which to use to build a web app in 2025

Framer, Webflow, or custom code: Which to use to build a web app in 2025

Framer or Webflow? Or custom code? With the abundance of features that website builders offer these days, you may be torn between these options – understandably so.

We at design agency Fivecube use both no-code/low-code website builders like Framer and Webflow and develop web apps from scratch. Here’s how each development method compares, based on our experience.

Webflow: Your Introduction

Pricing: Starts at $14/month; free plan available

With Webflow valuation reaching $4 billion, this solution is a true powerhouse in low-code/no-code web development. It combines a website builder, a composable CMS, and analytics and optimization tools all in a single platform. While it can be used without any coding experience, Webflow also provides extensive custom code capabilities to developers.

Key features:

  • Website drag-and-drop builder with advanced animations and interactions

  • Custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code support

  • Built-in content management system (CMS)

  • Built-in SEO, analytics, and A/B testing tools

  • Shared libraries for unifying design systems across web apps

  • Pre-built Webflow apps, with custom Webflow app support

  • DevLink for streamlining the design-to-development process

Framer: Your Introduction

Pricing: Starts at $5/month for personal use and $75/month for business use; free plan available

Framer’s capabilities are geared more towards designers instead of developers, and it’s best described as a Figma-like tool for building websites. That makes for a gentler learning curve, even though it comes at the cost of a more limited feature range compared to Webflow.

As for Framer’s capabilities, you get a visual builder, content management system, and solid real-time collaboration tools in a single package, along with analytics and SEO tools.

Key features:

  • Design canvas with a Figma-like experience for building websites

  • Layout templates and no-code animations

  • Built-in CMS and SEO tools, including automated SEO

  • Advanced analytics with out-of-the-box GDPR compliance

  • Real-time collaboration tools with role-based access

  • Staging domain support

  • Marketplace for third-party integrations and plugins

Webflow vs Framer: The Showdown

So, should you choose Webflow or Framer? Let’s compare the two tools across six criteria.

Category

Webflow

Framer

Design

Full control, responsive

Flexible, interactive

Content Management

Powerful CMS, structured data

Basic CMS, limited structure

Custom Code Support

Frontend + backend integrations

Interactive features, animations

SEO

Advanced SEO tools

Basic SEO, lower performance

Learning Curve

Steeper, more complex

Easier, Figma-like

Security

High (enterprise access)

High (enterprise access)


Design

Webflow offers full control over the website’s layout, typography, and styling. It also supports responsive design out of the box. Framer, however, provides higher flexibility in designing and adding interactive features and custom animations (e.g., hover effects, custom cursors).

Content Management

Webflow is an absolute powerhouse when it comes to content management capabilities. Its built-in CMS is highly scalable and flexible and can support a variety of content types. Framer’s CMS features, while available out of the box, are somewhat limited in comparison, especially when it comes to content structuring and data relationships.

Custom Code Support

Both Framer and Webflow support custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code. That said, Framer is more geared toward implementing custom-code interactive features and animations. Webflow, in turn, allows for custom code use beyond the frontend. With it, you can add custom integrations, APIs, and backend code.

SEO

Webflow’s SEO capabilities are comprehensive enough for a variety of needs, with deep customization for advanced SEO strategies. Framer’s SEO tools cover SEO basics well enough but lack robust indexability settings. Framer may also score lower on performance due to its reliance on JavaScript animations.

Learning Curve

Framer is times easier to get started with because its user experience is close to Figma’s. Webflow, in turn, has a steeper learning curve, mostly due to the wider range of features and customization options.

Security

Whether you choose Framer or Webflow, you can benefit from SOC II Type compliance, SSL encryption, and advanced DDoS protection. That said, in both cases, you’d have to be an enterprise customer to gain access to the full suite of security measures.

So, should you choose Webflow or Framer? Let’s compare the two tools across six criteria.

Category

Webflow

Framer

Design

Full control, responsive

Flexible, interactive

Content Management

Powerful CMS, structured data

Basic CMS, limited structure

Custom Code Support

Frontend + backend integrations

Interactive features, animations

SEO

Advanced SEO tools

Basic SEO, lower performance

Learning Curve

Steeper, more complex

Easier, Figma-like

Security

High (enterprise access)

High (enterprise access)


Design

Webflow offers full control over the website’s layout, typography, and styling. It also supports responsive design out of the box. Framer, however, provides higher flexibility in designing and adding interactive features and custom animations (e.g., hover effects, custom cursors).

Content Management

Webflow is an absolute powerhouse when it comes to content management capabilities. Its built-in CMS is highly scalable and flexible and can support a variety of content types. Framer’s CMS features, while available out of the box, are somewhat limited in comparison, especially when it comes to content structuring and data relationships.

Custom Code Support

Both Framer and Webflow support custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code. That said, Framer is more geared toward implementing custom-code interactive features and animations. Webflow, in turn, allows for custom code use beyond the frontend. With it, you can add custom integrations, APIs, and backend code.

SEO

Webflow’s SEO capabilities are comprehensive enough for a variety of needs, with deep customization for advanced SEO strategies. Framer’s SEO tools cover SEO basics well enough but lack robust indexability settings. Framer may also score lower on performance due to its reliance on JavaScript animations.

Learning Curve

Framer is times easier to get started with because its user experience is close to Figma’s. Webflow, in turn, has a steeper learning curve, mostly due to the wider range of features and customization options.

Security

Whether you choose Framer or Webflow, you can benefit from SOC II Type compliance, SSL encryption, and advanced DDoS protection. That said, in both cases, you’d have to be an enterprise customer to gain access to the full suite of security measures.

So, should you choose Webflow or Framer? Let’s compare the two tools across six criteria.

Category

Webflow

Framer

Design

Full control, responsive

Flexible, interactive

Content Management

Powerful CMS, structured data

Basic CMS, limited structure

Custom Code Support

Frontend + backend integrations

Interactive features, animations

SEO

Advanced SEO tools

Basic SEO, lower performance

Learning Curve

Steeper, more complex

Easier, Figma-like

Security

High (enterprise access)

High (enterprise access)


Design

Webflow offers full control over the website’s layout, typography, and styling. It also supports responsive design out of the box. Framer, however, provides higher flexibility in designing and adding interactive features and custom animations (e.g., hover effects, custom cursors).

Content Management

Webflow is an absolute powerhouse when it comes to content management capabilities. Its built-in CMS is highly scalable and flexible and can support a variety of content types. Framer’s CMS features, while available out of the box, are somewhat limited in comparison, especially when it comes to content structuring and data relationships.

Custom Code Support

Both Framer and Webflow support custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code. That said, Framer is more geared toward implementing custom-code interactive features and animations. Webflow, in turn, allows for custom code use beyond the frontend. With it, you can add custom integrations, APIs, and backend code.

SEO

Webflow’s SEO capabilities are comprehensive enough for a variety of needs, with deep customization for advanced SEO strategies. Framer’s SEO tools cover SEO basics well enough but lack robust indexability settings. Framer may also score lower on performance due to its reliance on JavaScript animations.

Learning Curve

Framer is times easier to get started with because its user experience is close to Figma’s. Webflow, in turn, has a steeper learning curve, mostly due to the wider range of features and customization options.

Security

Whether you choose Framer or Webflow, you can benefit from SOC II Type compliance, SSL encryption, and advanced DDoS protection. That said, in both cases, you’d have to be an enterprise customer to gain access to the full suite of security measures.

Framer vs Webflow: When to Choose Which?

In our experience, Framer works better for:

  • Marketing websites and landing pages with unique interactive features and visually rich design

  • Projects where real-time collaboration is crucial

  • Highly interactive, design-heavy website prototypes

Webflow, in turn, is more suitable for:

  • Content-driven websites that require granular SEO controls and advanced analytics

  • Web applications that require extensive custom code flexibility, especially for the backend

  • E-commerce websites (Framer doesn’t support e-commerce features out of the box)

What About Custom Code?

While website builders like Webflow and Framer can power a variety of projects, they do have their limitations. Those include:

  • Lack of full control over integrations and customizations

  • Difficulties in supporting sophisticated application logic

  • Potential performance and scalability issues

  • Potential vendor lock-in

In contrast, custom development gives you total control over the technology stack and functionality of your web app. For example, when you hire a SaaS web design agency, opting for custom development means its designers don’t have to account for the limitations of website builders.

All in all, custom development is usually suitable for:

  • SaaS products

  • Large, complex online stores with custom payment flows, auctions, subscriptions, etc.

  • Content-heavy websites with complex tagging, filtering, or dynamic page generation

  • Simple websites that you plan to scale into complex ones in the long run

Custom development can involve using cross-platform frontend technologies like React Native or complete tech stacks like the MERN stack.

Final Thoughts

Both Framer and Webflow are powerful website-building platforms, but they serve different purposes. Framer caters to projects that focus on creating unique designs and user experiences through motion and interactivity. Webflow, in turn, is geared towards building complex content-heavy websites that require extensive custom code support.

That said, some projects may simply be difficult or impossible to execute using low-code/no-code tools. If your project is one of them, we can help you turn your idea into a market-ready web app. Contact us to discuss how our experience can benefit you.

Apr 30, 2025

By

Yevheniy Kladov

Want a tailored solution?

Let’s build something great together!

By clicking ‘Submit,’ you consent to our Privacy Policy and marketing use of your information.